Monday, September 15, 2008

NEEDLEPOINT: Terrorists at war with India

NEEDLEPOINT:
Terrorists at war with India
India at peace with terrorists

By A. C. Vasishth

September 13 2008 serial bomb blasts in New Delhi have once again proved that we may be bold in our words but we are as much week in our actions in fighting terror. This has been proved not once, numerous times.

One of the main reasons for our failure to win the war against terror is that we always play politics with terrorism. This fact has paralysed the government as well as the political system. This reality has emboldened the terrorists so much that they feel free to strike any time and any place in the country where they want. When terrorists strike in non-Congress and non-UPA States – the way they did in Gujarat, Rajasthan and Karnataka two months back -- our government at the Centre and the Intelligence Bureau were quick to say that the State governments had been alerted in advance. It, obviously, meant that the State governments had failed to take the necessary precautions, in advance, to thwart the designs of the terrorists. But this time – and last time on the Diwali eve in 2005 – the terrorists struck right under the nose of the Union government. Does it then mean that here both the Union government and the intelligence agencies failed to both to gather information about the activities of the terror outfits and take precautionary measures?

Not only that. With Congress-led UPA at the Centre, in Andhra Pradesh, in Assam, in Maharashtra etc. there are Congress or Congress-led governments. But the State and the Central government failed to prevent the serial blasts in those States even and as a result hundreds of innocent men, women and children were killed and property worth hundreds of crores destroyed.

Each time the terrorists strike, our Prime Minister, Home Minister and others echo a stock reaction: The terrorists will not be able to defeat our resolve to fight terror. Each time the terrorists have given a befitting reply to the Union Government to prove that it does not means business while they do.

In the heat of the nation’s agony at the loss of life and property in Rajasthan and Gujarat when there were demands, even from the intelligence agencies, for enacting a strong anti-terror law, the Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh was again bold to declare that there is no need for revival of POTA and the existing laws were sufficient to deal with them. By striking in the heart of the national capital the terrorists have once again sent out a message that the Prime Minister is not right.

If the existing laws, as the Prime Minister claims, are sufficient, why is it that during the last over four years the present government has failed to take a single criminal case against terrorists to a logical conclusion and got him/them punished? Why is it that during the last three years the UPA government has failed to bring to book those involved in the 2005 Diwali-eve serial bomb blasts in Delhi, Samjhauta Express, Malegaon, Mumbai train serial blasts, blasts in Mecca masjid in Andhra Pradesh? The only inference one can draw is that while the existing laws are sufficient, it is the Government that has been found to be wanting.

USA is the oldest democracy in the world as is India the largest one. UK too is a democracy. But the moment 9/11 happened in USA, the moment 11/7 occurred in UK in the form of serial train blasts, they rose to the occasion to enact stringent laws to fight terror. This has paid dividends. The terrorists failed to strike again in both the countries.

But here in India, obviously, for political, nay electoral, reasons we are fighting shy of enacting any stringent law against terror. We do not gather the courage even to use the existing laws to catch hold of the culprits, lest our constituency of electoral supporters gets annoyed.

Our prime minister loses his sleeping over the wailing of the mother of a person taken into custody for suspected terror links in a foreign country. But, regrettably, he has never lost sleep over the death of hundreds of innocent men, women and children in terrorist strikes since he took over.

At the same time Dr. Manmohan Singh says "no community" should be singled out. Further, according to the Central intelligence agencies too, while the hand of SIMI has been unsuspectingly been proven, two Cabinet Ministers in his Government – Lalu Prasad Yadav and Ramvilas Paswan – have publicly opposed the ban on SIMI. The other important leader SP leader Mulayam Singh on whose support hinges the life of UPA has gone to the extent of saying that it is a social organisation.

In the face of September 13 blasts while the intelligence agencies, according to reports, are now focussing their attention on the three days spent by top SIMI activist Abu Bashir in Delhi in July this year to unravel the mystery of the Delhi serial blasts, Congress and Samajwadi Party leaders went to the extent of visiting Azamgarh home of the Ahmedabad blast mastermind "for expressing their solidarity with the jailed SIMI terror merchant" after he was arrested by Gujarat police.

The most failed Home Minister Shivraj Patil appealing for peace said: "We will continue to deal firmly with such (terrorist) elements. We will find those responsible behind the blasts and harshest punishment would be given..." How laughable from a person during whose performance has throughout been dismal!

In their e-mail the terrorist outfit has threatened Mumbai to be the next target. If past performance is any indication, its threat may prove to be real while the government may be found fumbling for words of explanations for having miserably failed to act.

If the present government closes its eyes to see the reality that the terrorists are at war against India, it alone is to be blamed for this. But it must understand that this war against terrorism cannot be fought with the doves of peace. We need the honestly, zeal and the spirit to turn our words into actions. ***

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Interview with Syed Shahnawaz Hussain

‘Secularists’ dividing Hindus & Muslims: Shahnawaz
Personally I stand for Akhand Bharat

Syed Shahnawaz Hussain is a young two-time BJP MP with a broad, progressive outlook. He was yet to complete 32 when he became first a Minister of State and later elevated to Cabinet rank in NDA government at the Centre. From the start of his political career he is in the BJP. Presently, he is the President of BJP Minority Morcha Cell. Congress-Lalu-Mulayam are politically thriving on by creating divisions between Hindus and Muslims, he says. “If there was no misunderstanding between the two main communities, many leaders and political parties, I realized, would go out of political business”. BJP is practicing an honest secularism and giving equal respect and honour to all communities, including Muslims, he maintains.

Amba Charan Vashishth had a detailed interview with him in Delhi in the last month. Excerpts:

What made you to join politics?

My original dream was to be a doctor or engineer. When I was in third class, I discovered that President and Prime Minister was the highest office in the country. Therefore, I got fascinated towards politics. Even otherwise, I had interest in politics from my school days. When in the eighth class I contested a school election, but lost by just one vote. I did my Matriculation in 1982 getting 87 percent marks. I wanted to join Aligarh Muslim University but we were hard up of money because we had lost our lands to the tillers. My mother said she would sell her ornaments to make me study higher. I revolted. I said I can remain uneducated, but not study with this money. I did my intermediate staying with my maternal uncle where I came in contact with Shri George Fernandes.


Why only BJP even when there is so much propaganda regarding its being anti-minorities?

In 1984 I came to Delhi in Pusa Polytechnic from where I received a diploma. Here I came in contact with Shri Suresh Srivastava who was connected with BJP. He told me in detail about BJP. He took me to BJP leader Shri Arif Beg. I took a dig at him: How is he in BJP being a Muslim? We waited for him. As he heralded I came to know he was coming after namaz. I myself was not used to it at that time. I got impressed.

Shri Arif Beg made me understand that BJP is a big party working for the welfare of Hindus/Muslims and if more and more Muslims associated with it, the Hindu-Muslim unity will get strengthened. The misunderstanding and misconception about BJP in the Muslim mind is because of lack of communication and false propaganda by vested interests who, for their political selfishness, do not wish that Hindus and Muslims should be one. We have to act as a bridge between the two communities, he told me.

From there started my association with BJP and I never looked back. I myself found that there was great false propaganda against BJP. As my association with the party grew deeper and longer, my dedication and commitment to the Party went on increasing. I found BJP was the only party that was truly and honestly secular while others were just paying a lip service just for community’s votes without doing anything for it. BJP, I found, entertained no ill-will against Muslims and all my misgivings were removed. If there was no misunderstanding between the two main communities, many leaders and political parties, I realized, would go out of political business.

How did you scale up the ladder?

Then I came in contact with ABVP national president Shri Raj Kumar Bhatia and Sushri Uma Bharti. I worked in JNU. I became active in BJP Yuva Morcha. On December 4, 1997 I organised a Muslim Youth sammelan in Delhi which impressed both Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Shri Lal Krishna Advani. Atalji said if Shahnawaz could enter Parliament that would be good. I was made to contest against Syed Shahabuddin from Kishanganj whose 70 percent population is Muslim. Only Shri Sushil Modi had come for my election campaign. I was defeated by this stalwart by just six thousand votes. But I did not lose heart. I stuck to the constituency and worked hard. In 1999 Lok Sabha elections I defeated Mr Taslimuddin. My first speech in Lok Sabha was on Ayodhya. Atalji blessed me with an embrace. Advaniji and Georgeji also appreciated it.

Was your work and dedication rewarded?

Yes, very much. I was first made a Minister of State for Sports and Youth Affairs. Later, I was given independent charge of Coal. Then, I was elevated to Cabinet rank with the Textile portfolio and later given the charge of Civil Aviation. I was made a member of the Central Election Committee in which I still continue. When Venkaiahji, Advaniji and Rajnathji became Party presidents, they made me the National Secretary. Now I have been made the President of the Minority Morcha. Rajnathji said, “It will send out a positive message and help the party reach out to minority communities”.


When some 'secular' leaders or some of your Muslim brothers call BJP 'communal', what feelings does it ignite in your mind?

I only laugh at their ignorance. They are living on misconceptions and only harming the cause of the community. I can say with confidence that no party is more secular than BJP. In fact, in India we have two kinds of secularism -- honest secularism and dishonest one. BJP is practicing the honest secularism. It is a false propaganda that BJP is opposed to minorities. The so-called secular parties are responsible for the present plight and sufferings of the Muslim community. Post-Godhra riots in Gujarat are an aberration under BJP rule. There have been numerous communal riots in Gujarat under successive Congress governments. During the past seven years, not a single case of communal riots has taken place in Gujarat. If the opposition criticizes Shri Modi for other things, it should also appreciate at least this achievement of his.
We do not make distinction between majority and minority. BJP Minority Morcha Cell shows that there is a place of honour for minorities in the Party.

Did you any time feel that you are a misfit in BJP?

No. Never. I did never feel any time that I am being discriminated against being a Muslim. In spite of my being quite young, I have always received place of honour and invited to every important party meeting, chintan bhaithaks in Goa and Mumbai.


What does religion mean to you?

For me rashtra dharma is supreme. Pitri dharma and matri dharma also come in the same category. Whether somebody recites his namaz or worships a god; it is a matter personal to him.
.
Crores of Muslims because of their love for the motherland decided to stay put in India after Partition and could not be lured into shifting to Pakistan just because of their religious affinity. Do you think they have assimilated themselves into the national mainstream?

Crores of Muslims because of their patriotism and love for India continued to live in their motherland despite partition of the country on communal lines. Those who accepted partition migrated to Pakistan. But our ancestors decided to stick to their soil. They preferred to throw their lot with their Hindu brethren than with others. That is why today we have a galaxy of Muslims who have brought laurels to the country -- Capt. Abdul Hamid, Capt. Hanifuddin, Sania Mirza, Zahir Khan, Irfan Khan, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam and many others.

How safe, in your view, are minorities in India, particularly in NDA or BJP-ruled States?

Minorities are safer in the BJP and NDA-ruled States than elsewhere. I want an open discussion on this issue. The condition of Muslims is very bad in the States of West Bengal and Assam while they are quite well off in Gujarat where Muslims have a higher per capita income than in other States.

How far, in your view, the abolition of Article 370 in the Constitution and Common Civil Code is going to adversely affect the interests of minorities, particularly Muslims?

If Article 370 had been scrapped, there would have been no Kashmir problem today. It even discriminates between a J&K Muslim and a Muslim in the rest of the country. Today people of Jammu-Kashmir can purchase property in Patna, but the people, including Muslims, of the rest of the country cannot in J&K. If Article 370 is removed, I would wish to have a house in Gulmarg area. Mr. Omar Abdullah says I am an Indian, but he speaks a different language in his State. Article 370 should be scrapped immediately.

I stand for a Common Civil Code. Actually, it involves reforms only in marriage laws. Today Hindus and Muslims wear the same clothes; they have common food habits. India presents a picture of unity in diversity. Actually, some people are misleading the Muslims saying that if this is done, Muslims will have to don dhoti and instead of visiting a graveyard (kabristan) they will have to go to Hindu cremation grounds. This is all non-sense, unfortunate


What place do minorities enjoy in your Party?

A place of respect and honour like any Hindu.

What have you so far done to dispel the misgivings about BJP among minorities?

I have been assigned the duty to connect more and more minorities with the BJP. It is as difficult a matter as it is easy. It is a challenge too. Reason: Since the days of Nehru, a sustained campaign has been continuing to paint Jana Sangh and now BJP as anti-minority. This impression is now getting obliterated. We organized a Muslim Yuva Sammelan in 1997. Advaniji’s speech was very much appreciated there. We wish to turn the injustice that is being perpetrated against Muslims since the days of Congress into justice. Recently, we organized a rally at Kota (Rajasthan) where 20,000 Muslims participated. Morcha organized rallies against terrorism all over the country. Indo-US Deal is an attempt to enslave India. It is against Indians whether they are Hindus, Muslims or others.

Terrorism is a great threat to the country. This must be curbed at all costs. On this account, Muslims of the country, as a whole, should not be seen as suspects. They love the country and are patriots.

What should the majority and minority communities do to obliterate the distinction between the two to make India acquire one identity of Indians and Indians alone?

In the Muslim Yuva Sammelan we passed a resolution that cow-slaughter should be banned. Media ignored it. Darrul Uloom has also demanded its ban. Muslims need to come forward on this issue. Ram Mandir issue too should be solved amicably through understanding between the two communities.

We want that Afzal Guru should be hanged as per the verdict of the Supreme Court. The only problem is that we look at him as a terrorist and Congress-Lalu-Mulayam look at him as a Muslim. They look at terrorism through the prism of religion. It is the Congress and its friends who have put a question mark on the patriotism of Muslims. POTA should be revived. Section 302 IPC too is misused; should it also be abolished?

To what extent has the rise of terrorism, particularly the cross-border terrorism, impacted the life of Muslims in India?

I wish to make it clear that Pakistan is the enemy of Indian Muslims. Muslims in India are thriving unhindered. They have made the country proud with having Presidents, Chief Justices, Vice-Presidents, Governors, and made their name in every sphere including cricket and films. This Pakistan cannot digest. That is why it is conspiring against India. It is Pakistan and not Hindus who are enemies of Muslims. ISI is the mother of all troubles. If Pakistan had not been created, Hindus and Muslims would have progressed shoulder to shoulder. Although I accept the reality of Pakistan, yet as an Indian I stand for the concept of Akhand Bharat. If the Berlin wall can fall leading to unification of East and West Germany, India and Pakistan can also be one day united into one country.


What are the main reasons for the backwardness of the Muslim community, particularly women?

Congress which ruled over the country for about 50 years since independence is responsible for all the ills and problems facing the minorities, particularly Muslims. They have not allowed Muslims to join the national mainstream just to exploit them for votes.

How much weightage would you give to the fatwas of Deoband?

Day-today fatwas have no meaning. These should be issued only when necessary and should be for the benefit and progress of the community

What are your Minority Morcha’s immediate plans, particularly in view of the year-end elections in five State assemblies and then Lok Sabha elections in 2009?

The Muslim community is angry with Congress Party for all the ills facing it. It feels cheated. Muslims are making the country proud in every field. If Israel and Philistine could be at peace; if Sushri Mayawati can have friendship with Brahmins, why can’t BJP earn the faith and confidence of Muslims when it is their real benefactor? It is not something impossible.

We will mobilize the minority community by organizing large demonstrations, rallies and conferences. Three times in the past Shri Rajnath Singh has come to our conferences. Shri Advaniji too blessed our programmes. Shri Atalji is also with us. We plan to organize a massive Muslim rally in Delhi where we expect a congregation of 2 lakh Muslims to show that Muslims in India are with BJP.
Muslims have great faith in the clean and honest image of Advaniji. Under his leadership BJP will form a government at the Centre. This government will usher in all-round prosperity and progress of the minorities. ***










‘Secularists’ dividing Hindus & Muslims: Shahnawaz
Personally I stand for Akhand Bharat



Shri Syed Shahnawaz Hussain is a young two-time BJP MP with a broad, progressive outlook. He was yet to complete 32 when he became first a Minister of State and later elevated to Cabinet rank in NDA government at the Centre. From the start of his political career he is in the BJP. Presently, he is the President of BJP Minority Morcha Cell. Congress-Lalu-Mulayam are politically thriving on by creating divisions between Hindus and Muslims, he says. “If there was no misunderstanding between the two main communities, many leaders and political parties, I realized, would go out of political business”. BJP is practicing an honest secularism and giving equal respect and honour to all communities, including Muslims, he maintains.

Shri Amba Charan Vashishth had a detailed interview with him in Delhi in the last week of July. Excerpts:

What made you to join politics?

My original dream was to be a doctor or engineer. When I was in third class, I discovered that President and Prime Minister was the highest office in the country. Therefore, I got fascinated towards politics. Even otherwise, I had interest in politics from my school days. When in the eighth class I contested a school election, but lost by just one vote. I did my Matriculation in 1982 getting 87 percent marks. I wanted to join Aligarh Muslim University but we were hard up of money because we had lost our lands to the tillers. My mother said she would sell her ornaments to make me study higher. I revolted. I said I can remain uneducated, but not study with this money. I did my intermediate staying with my maternal uncle where I came in contact with Shri George Fernandes.


Why only BJP even when there is so much propaganda regarding its being anti-minorities?

In 1984 I came to Delhi in Pusa Polytechnic from where I received a diploma. Here I came in contact with Shri Suresh Srivastava who was connected with BJP. He told me in detail about BJP. He took me to BJP leader Shri Arif Beg. I took a dig at him: How is he in BJP being a Muslim? We waited for him. As he heralded I came to know he was coming after namaz. I myself was not used to it at that time. I got impressed.

Shri Arif Beg made me understand that BJP is a big party working for the welfare of Hindus/Muslims and if more and more Muslims associated with it, the Hindu-Muslim unity will get strengthened. The misunderstanding and misconception about BJP in the Muslim mind is because of lack of communication and false propaganda by vested interests who, for their political selfishness, do not wish that Hindus and Muslims should be one. We have to act as a bridge between the two communities, he told me.

From there started my association with BJP and I never looked back. I myself found that there was great false propaganda against BJP. As my association with the party grew deeper and longer, my dedication and commitment to the Party went on increasing. I found BJP was the only party that was truly and honestly secular while others were just paying a lip service just for community’s votes without doing anything for it. BJP, I found, entertained no ill-will against Muslims and all my misgivings were removed. If there was no misunderstanding between the two main communities, many leaders and political parties, I realized, would go out of political business.

How did you scale up the ladder?

Then I came in contact with ABVP national president Shri Raj Kumar Bhatia and Sushri Uma Bharti. I worked in JNU. I became active in BJP Yuva Morcha. On December 4, 1997 I organised a Muslim Youth sammelan in Delhi which impressed both Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Shri Lal Krishna Advani. Atalji said if Shahnawaz could enter Parliament that would be good. I was made to contest against Syed Shahabuddin from Kishanganj whose 70 percent population is Muslim. Only Shri Sushil Modi had come for my election campaign. I was defeated by this stalwart by just six thousand votes. But I did not lose heart. I stuck to the constituency and worked hard. In 1999 Lok Sabha elections I defeated Mr Taslimuddin. My first speech in Lok Sabha was on Ayodhya. Atalji blessed me with an embrace. Advaniji and Georgeji also appreciated it.

Was your work and dedication rewarded?

Yes, very much. I was first made a Minister of State for Sports and Youth Affairs. Later, I was given independent charge of Coal. Then, I was elevated to Cabinet rank with the Textile portfolio and later given the charge of Civil Aviation. I was made a member of the Central Election Committee in which I still continue. When Venkaiahji, Advaniji and Rajnathji became Party presidents, they made me the National Secretary. Now I have been made the President of the Minority Morcha. Rajnathji said, “It will send out a positive message and help the party reach out to minority communities”.


When some 'secular' leaders or some of your Muslim brothers call BJP 'communal', what feelings does it ignite in your mind?

I only laugh at their ignorance. They are living on misconceptions and only harming the cause of the community. I can say with confidence that no party is more secular than BJP. In fact, in India we have two kinds of secularism -- honest secularism and dishonest one. BJP is practicing the honest secularism. It is a false propaganda that BJP is opposed to minorities. The so-called secular parties are responsible for the present plight and sufferings of the Muslim community. Post-Godhra riots in Gujarat are an aberration under BJP rule. There have been numerous communal riots in Gujarat under successive Congress governments. During the past seven years, not a single case of communal riots has taken place in Gujarat. If the opposition criticizes Shri Modi for other things, it should also appreciate at least this achievement of his.
We do not make distinction between majority and minority. BJP Minority Morcha Cell shows that there is a place of honour for minorities in the Party.

Did you any time feel that you are a misfit in BJP?

No. Never. I did never feel any time that I am being discriminated against being a Muslim. In spite of my being quite young, I have always received place of honour and invited to every important party meeting, chintan bhaithaks in Goa and Mumbai.


What does religion mean to you?

For me rashtra dharma is supreme. Pitri dharma and matri dharma also come in the same category. Whether somebody recites his namaz or worships a god; it is a matter personal to him.
.
Crores of Muslims because of their love for the motherland decided to stay put in India after Partition and could not be lured into shifting to Pakistan just because of their religious affinity. Do you think they have assimilated themselves into the national mainstream?

Crores of Muslims because of their patriotism and love for India continued to live in their motherland despite partition of the country on communal lines. Those who accepted partition migrated to Pakistan. But our ancestors decided to stick to their soil. They preferred to throw their lot with their Hindu brethren than with others. That is why today we have a galaxy of Muslims who have brought laurels to the country -- Capt. Abdul Hamid, Capt. Hanifuddin, Sania Mirza, Zahir Khan, Irfan Khan, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam and many others.

How safe, in your view, are minorities in India, particularly in NDA or BJP-ruled States?

Minorities are safer in the BJP and NDA-ruled States than elsewhere. I want an open discussion on this issue. The condition of Muslims is very bad in the States of West Bengal and Assam while they are quite well off in Gujarat where Muslims have a higher per capita income than in other States.

How far, in your view, the abolition of Article 370 in the Constitution and Common Civil Code is going to adversely affect the interests of minorities, particularly Muslims?

If Article 370 had been scrapped, there would have been no Kashmir problem today. It even discriminates between a J&K Muslim and a Muslim in the rest of the country. Today people of Jammu-Kashmir can purchase property in Patna, but the people, including Muslims, of the rest of the country cannot in J&K. If Article 370 is removed, I would wish to have a house in Gulmarg area. Mr. Omar Abdullah says I am an Indian, but he speaks a different language in his State. Article 370 should be scrapped immediately.

I stand for a Common Civil Code. Actually, it involves reforms only in marriage laws. Today Hindus and Muslims wear the same clothes; they have common food habits. India presents a picture of unity in diversity. Actually, some people are misleading the Muslims saying that if this is done, Muslims will have to don dhoti and instead of visiting a graveyard (kabristan) they will have to go to Hindu cremation grounds. This is all non-sense, unfortunate


What place do minorities enjoy in your Party?


A place of respect and honour like any Hindu.

What have you so far done to dispel the misgivings about BJP among minorities?

I have been assigned the duty to connect more and more minorities with the BJP. It is as difficult a matter as it is easy. It is a challenge too. Reason: Since the days of Nehru, a sustained campaign has been continuing to paint Jana Sangh and now BJP as anti-minority. This impression is now getting obliterated. We organized a Muslim Yuva Sammelan in 1997. Advaniji’s speech was very much appreciated there. We wish to turn the injustice that is being perpetrated against Muslims since the days of Congress into justice. Recently, we organized a rally at Kota (Rajasthan) where 20,000 Muslims participated. Morcha organized rallies against terrorism all over the country. Indo-US Deal is an attempt to enslave India. It is against Indians whether they are Hindus, Muslims or others.

Terrorism is a great threat to the country. This must be curbed at all costs. On this account, Muslims of the country, as a whole, should not be seen as suspects. They love the country and are patriots.

What should the majority and minority communities do to obliterate the distinction between the two to make India acquire one identity of Indians and Indians alone?

In the Muslim Yuva Sammelan we passed a resolution that cow-slaughter should be banned. Media ignored it. Darrul Uloom has also demanded its ban. Muslims need to come forward on this issue. Ram Mandir issue too should be solved amicably through understanding between the two communities.

We want that Afzal Guru should be hanged as per the verdict of the Supreme Court. The only problem is that we look at him as a terrorist and Congress-Lalu-Mulayam look at him as a Muslim. They look at terrorism through the prism of religion. It is the Congress and its friends who have put a question mark on the patriotism of Muslims. POTA should be revived. Section 302 IPC too is misused; should it also be abolished?

To what extent has the rise of terrorism, particularly the cross-border terrorism, impacted the life of Muslims in India?

I wish to make it clear that Pakistan is the enemy of Indian Muslims. Muslims in India are thriving unhindered. They have made the country proud with having Presidents, Chief Justices, Vice-Presidents, Governors, and made their name in every sphere including cricket and films. This Pakistan cannot digest. That is why it is conspiring against India. It is Pakistan and not Hindus who are enemies of Muslims. ISI is the mother of all troubles. If Pakistan had not been created, Hindus and Muslims would have progressed shoulder to shoulder. Although I accept the reality of Pakistan, yet as an Indian I stand for the concept of Akhand Bharat. If the Berlin wall can fall leading to unification of East and West Germany, India and Pakistan can also be one day united into one country.


What are the main reasons for the backwardness of the Muslim community, particularly women?

Congress which ruled over the country for about 50 years since independence is responsible for all the ills and problems facing the minorities, particularly Muslims. They have not allowed Muslims to join the national mainstream just to exploit them for votes.

How much weightage would you give to the fatwas of Deoband?

Day-today fatwas have no meaning. These should be issued only when necessary and should be for the benefit and progress of the community

What are your Minority Morcha’s immediate plans, particularly in view of the year-end elections in five State assemblies and then Lok Sabha elections in 2009?

The Muslim community is angry with Congress Party for all the ills facing it. It feels cheated. Muslims are making the country proud in every field. If Israel and Philistine could be at peace; if Sushri Mayawati can have friendship with Brahmins, why can’t BJP earn the faith and confidence of Muslims when it is their real benefactor? It is not something impossible.

We will mobilize the minority community by organizing large demonstrations, rallies and conferences. Three times in the past Shri Rajnath Singh has come to our conferences. Shri Advaniji too blessed our programmes. Shri Atalji is also with us. We plan to organize a massive Muslim rally in Delhi where we expect a congregation of 2 lakh Muslims to show that Muslims in India are with BJP.
Muslims have great faith in the clean and honest image of Advaniji. Under his leadership BJP will form a government at the Centre. This government will usher in all-round prosperity and progress of the minorities. ***

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Needlepoint

They killed Rajiv Gandhi again on July 22

By Amba Charan Vashishth

A mother had a son unemployed. Each day he would roam about to earn something and in the evening return empty handed to the dismay of his distraught mother who was yearning for the day when he would put his earnings in her lap.

One day, he returned all smiling with a bag full of money which he presented to his mother. In disbelief, she put the bag aside and asked, “From where did you earn this much money? This cannot be a hard day’s honest earnings. Tell me the truth”

The son was not expecting this response. He had thought his mother would be damn happy. He kept quiet. The mother started shouting, “Have you robbed somebody? Have you murdered someone to snatch this much money? I am not going to touch it”, she said and kicked the bag away.

This exactly would have been the response of Dr. Manmohan Singh’s proud and virtuous mother if she were alive today. When he would have waved the two-finger victory sign with a broad smile to her, she would certainly have questioned, “How did you achieve this miracle, my son?” She could not have so easily swallowed this wonder of marvelous victory.

When explained that he had robbed the opposition of 24 MPs who cross voted for him or absented from voting in defiance of the party whip, the pious, virtuous lady would certainly have, with a deep sigh, reminded her illustrious, victorious son of Michael de Montaigne’s words: "There are some defeats more triumphant than victories."

Of late, we have turned very permissive. We explain away victories gained through underhand means by subverting the law, puncturing the balloon of morality, kicking the standards of ethics and ignoring the qualms of conscience. Everything is fair in love, war and in politics, we say. Whatever the means, we explain, victory is victory, defeat is defeat. . And that mentality is also the mother of all our troubles in politics.

Some may bestow Dr. Manmohan Singh with the honour of now being a “King Singh” or Opposition Killer who “comes into his own to win” Politicians in India may celebrate this victory which is, in effect, a defeat of the parliamentary democracy in the world’s largest democracy. We have made ourselves a laughing stock of the world by having won a vote of confidence through the weapon of horse-trading. With what face can India claim to be a nation which had, in the ancient past, preached high moral values, standards of ethics and ideals of honesty. No wonder, if tomorrow we may have to import these virtues from abroad.

The Manmohan government victory has put to shame the victory late prime minister Mr. P. V. Narasimharao recorded in 1993 by purchasing three JMM MPs. Mr. Rao was convicted of the crime of bribing the MPs but the MPs got scot free because of the provisions of Article 105 (2) in the Constitution: “No member of Parliament shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or any vote given by him in Parliament or any committee thereof, ….” Its interpretation in the case implied that our honourable MPs had the proud ‘privilege’ to be bribed for voting in the House inspired by hefty monetary considerations.

This ugly, notorious example should have stirred the conscience of our lawmakers to plug the loophole and amend the law so that the country had not once again to feel small in the eyes of the world. But who can do it? The lawmakers and the ruling party alone, nobody else. But why should a ruling party do? Every ruling dispensation, particularly in the present era of coalition governments, has a vested interest to let this situation persist. Who knows when a ruling alliance may need this very Rambaan to save its gaddi?

Ironically, it is the illustrious Nehru-Gandhi dynasty presently represented by the mother-son duo of Mrs. Sonia Gandhi and Mr. Rahul Gandhi taking pride at this great victory through massive defections. The same clan which otherwise feels great at the Nehru-Gandhi legacy. These Gandhis, Dr. Manmohan Singh and the like have humbled late Rajiv Gandhi who raised his head high in having saved the country of the curse of defections.

Is it not ironical that about two dozen MPs, who played the chivalrous act of saving Manmohan government stand to lose their membership of the House sooner or later for their crime of defection by defying the party whip, but the government that survived with these illegal votes would get away with the booty of this crime?

A person is the legal heir to the property of his father or brother in the event of their death, but not when he/she ventures to inherit that property by eliminating them through a crime of murder. But here is a case in which the UPA government will get away with the spoils of the crime committed to save itself by instigating, alluring and motivating persons to throw to the winds the anti-defection law.

It is on record that our victorious Prime Minister telephoned to thank and pat each one of the ‘daring’ MPs to extend a halo of respectability for what is a crime in the eyes of the anti-defection law passed by this very Parliament to whom he is responsible.


State after State and lately, at the Centre, the present Congress leadership is killing Rajiv Gandhi again and again for what he stood for. ***

Sunday, July 27, 2008

Satirically speaking: Ask our honourable public representatives, son!

Satirically yours
Ask our honourable public representatives, son!
By Amba Charan Vashishth

Son: Father.

Father: Yes, my son.

Son: What is horse-trading?

Father : Quite simple -- trading in horses.

Son: Are our MPs horses?

Father: You fool, what are you saying? Are you crazy? They’re our honourable
MPs.

Son: But why is voting in parliament being referred to have been
influenced by horse-trading?

Father: Because some MPs changed their loyalty and voted against the party
whip.

Son: But then how is it horse-trading?

Father: Because some money was exchanged in changing loyalties.

Son: But a horse is an animal and our MPs are human beings with a head
and a conscience. Can they be traded?

Father: No, son, they can’t be.

Son: Then what does it mean that there was horse-trading in Parliament.

Father: It looks that was said because there were media reports suggesting
that crores of rupees were exchanged in exchange of loyalty of each
MP.

Son: But the horse only changes his master and not loyalty because he
remains loyal to his master who purchases him.

Father: This is exactly what did our MPs. They voted in favour of whoever
paid the highest bid amount ignoring the party whip.

Son: But the horse is an animal very loyal and obedient.

Father: So are the MPs to the person or the Party who pays them.

Son: But no money is paid to the horse. It is exchanged only between the
buyer and the seller.

Father: That’s true, son.

Son: Does that mean a horse is more honest and sincere than our MPs
because he gets no money?

Father: I don’t know son. Ask, our honourable public representatives.
***

Satirically speaking

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Needlepoint: Country's curse -- Ignoramus Union Ministers

Country's curse – ignoramus Union Ministers

By Amba Charan Vashishth
Words: 1042

"Can Advani be called a Pakistani infiltrator because he's from Sindh? Most chief ministers of West Bengal were from erstwhile East Bengal. Can they be called infiltrators?"

These are the words and arguments not of an ordinary Congress worker in the street but of India's Minister for External Affairs Pranab Mukherjee while addressing a seminar organized by a Muslim NGO on June 15 at Kolkata. His message was obviously and deliberately targeted at the peculiar audience before him.

Such arguments only betray desperate frustration giving credence to an old saying that when a person falls short of arguments, he starts calling names and comes to blows.

By comparing Advani with infiltrators Mr Mukherjee has repeated the same blunder which his veteran colleague Home Minister Shivraj Patil committed by comparing Afzal Guru with Sarabjit Singh. The former is an Indian held guilty of conspiring a terrorist attack in which about 9 innocent securitymen were killed defending the Parliament building where the top leadership of the country was holed up at that time. He was sentenced to death by the Supreme Court (SC). On the contrary Sarabjit Singh is an Indian pronounced guilty of terrorism and espionage by a Pakistani court. The former is a traitor, the latter a hero, a patriot. Our great home minister fails to distinguish between the two.

And contrast what Sarbjit’s wife Mrs. Sukhpreet Kaur says, “I and my daughters would never like Sarabjit freed in exchange for any hardcore Pakistani terrorist lodged in Indian jails. Nothing is above the nation and we can’t go against the interests of the motherland”. Who should feel ashamed is obvious.

And now our venerable Minister for Foreign Affairs fails to distinguish between an Indian citizen and a Bangladeshi infiltrator. He appears ignorant of the law of the land and the Constitution. According to the Oxford Advanced Learners’ Dictionary, an infiltrator is “a person who secretly becomes a member of a group (in our case India) or goes to a place to get information or to influence the group”.

Article 6 of the Constitution, as applicable to the case of Mr. Advani, says “:….a person who has migrated to the territory of India from the territory now included in Pakistan shall be deemed to be a citizen of India at the commencement of this Constitution if (a) he or either of his parents or any of his grandparents was born in India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 …”

One can only pity Mr. Mukherjee's understanding. The only saving grace however is that he spared his party and the country by not saying that Pakistan President General Musharraf is more “Indian” than is Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh because Musharraf was born in Delhi and Dr. Manmohan Singh in what now forms part of Pakistan.

Lakhs of Indians migrated (and in the process more than 10 lakhs were killed) to this side of the border from those parts which are now in Pakistan and Bangladesh to an uncertain future leaving their ancestral homes and hearths for their love of India. By equating refugees from Pakistan with infiltrators from Bangladesh Mr. Mukherjee has only put salt on the wounds of these Indians and insulted their patriotism.

And he goes on, “…it was not unusual for people from a smaller economy like Bangladesh to move into a bigger economy like India…this happens all over the world”. Here again he fails to make distinction between people of one country moving to the other as per law and those doing it in a clandestine manner, illegally.

If there were no infiltrator, why did the Congress government enact the Illegal Migrants (Detection by Tribunals) Act, 1983? Setting aside this Act as “unconstitutional” the Supreme Court said: "This IMDT Act, 1983 has created the biggest hurdle and is the main impediment or barrier in the identification and deportation of illegal migrants.”

That UPA was playing politics was evident from the fact that instead of acting as per the judicial verdict, on the eve of last assembly elections it clandestinely amended the Foreigners’ Act as applicable to Assam. SC was once again constrained to strike down this amendment too as "unconstitutional" calling it a crude attempt to bring in the IMDT Act from the backdoor.

Mr. Mukherjee's logic only repudiates Congress' supreme leader, late Mrs. Indira Gandhi who, way back in 1971, raised a great hue and cry the world over, over the exodus of about 80-90 lakh people from the then East Pakistan into India.

Mr. Mukherjee is again playing politics when he says “there is no reason to believe that lakhs of Bangladeshi are infiltrating into India”. As a Union Minister he should have the exact figures with him to buttress his argument. He is deliberately indulging in selective memory/amnesia and selective beliefs. The Congress Chief Minister of Assam, late Mr. Hiteshwar Saikia had admitted in the Assembly of more than one crore Bangladeshis having infiltrated into Assam. But under pressure, for obvious political reasons, he was later made to withdraw this statement.

On May 6, 1997 Mr Inderjit Gupta, Union Home Minister in the United Front government supported by Congress from outside, in reply to a question informed the Lok Sabha that the number of illegal infiltrators in the country is estimated to be about one crore.

Mr. Mukherjee does not wish to remember or believe what doesn’t suit his party's political and electoral purposes. The former Assam Governor, General S. K. Sinha, in a report to the President of India, had warned that "the unabated influx of migrants from Bangladesh to Assam and the consequent perceptible change in the demographic pattern of the State….threatens to reduce the Assamese people to a minority in their own State".

Mr. Mukherjee is oblivious of the fact that Indians legally living for generations together in Kenya, Uganda, Thailand, South Africa, Fiji, etc. were mercilessly thrown out although they were not infiltrators, as Bangladeshis are, whom UPA wishes to provide shelter and extend every facility that is available to native Indians.

The problem is that people like Mr. Pranab Mukherjee and Mr. Shivraj Patil are playing politics with the interests of the nation for obvious electoral gains. Does India deserve such ignoramus government leaders? That remains the question. ***

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

Spidernet: A Satire

Ask them, my son!

Roadshow as armour in election warfare

By Amba Charan Vashishth

Son: Father.
Father: Yes, my son.
Son: What is a roadshow?
Father: It is a new weapon invented in the armoury for use during election warfare.
Son: Who invented it, father?
Father: Nobody has so far claimed the intellectual rights. But as my knowledge goes, it was first tested-fired in 1998?
Son: By whom, father?
Father: Mrs. Sonia Gandhi and later, rightly inherited by her son, Rahul Gandhi.
Son: How does it work?
Father: It is easier to handle and simpler to use than the conventional technique of speech-making.
Son: How, father?
Father: An election speech is a fling of love for the audience and shot of an arrow of words at the opponents. It earns supporters and smashes the opposition forts.
Son: Is making a speech as simple as throwing a stone at your opponents?
Father: No, my son. Making a speech targeting your opponent is as intricate and difficult a job as going on an aerial sortie for bombardment at enemy targets. It needs expertise and experience.
Son: Does a person making a speech become an effective communicator?
Father: No. Not certainly always and, the least, everybody.
Son: But where is the problem? Today we have professional speechwriters who create great speeches which have great instant impact.
Father: We do have great speechwriters. But writing a speech and making a speech are two different things, equally difficult. If speechwriters could turn every Tom, Dick and Harry into prime ministers and presidents in a democracy, we need no intelligence and experience to make a mark.
Son: But we do have leaders who make great speeches.
Father: Yes, we do have. But many of them are readers, not leaders.
Son: How does the roadshow armour strike?
Father: When you don't wish to speak or have nothing to speak, the armour of roadshow is the best weapon against your opponent. In an election rally, it is the public that comes to see and hear you. In a roadshow it is the leaders who come to show their face to the roadside spectators, wave their hands, shake hands with them and trade their smile for votes.
Son: Our film actors and actresses too gesture to their fans in halls with their arms wide open, smooching their fingers crying wildly: "I love you all." And the hall bursts wild into roars of applause in response. Is this also of the same kind?
Father: I don't know, son. The only similarity seems to be that in both cases the gathering is of fans that may or may not necessarily vote in an election.
Son: Do these actresses love all?
Father: I don't know. I have no personal experience, son. Others may know better.
Son: In which election warfare was the weapon of roadshow used?
Father: In UP, then Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh and lately, in Karnataka.
Son: With what results?
Father: I don't know son. Ask Sonia and Rahul. ***